hi

wow. guess what. im starting to get confident for history. haha. wth. and i havent even studied content. but anyway, way of answering questions:

SBQ:
Step 1: Identify type of qn (yes/no or factor question)
Step 2: Group sources based on yes/no/both or factors
Step 3: Think of any Contextual Knowledge that u can add... more info to examples?
Step 4: Reliability of 1 or more sources and why (can compare to CK, biased?, one-sided?)
Step 5: Come up with criterion and stand
Step 6: Write essay (hope front 5 steps don't take more than 5 minutes and reading of sources 5 mins too)

SEQ:
Step 1: Identify type of qn
Step 2: Come out with factors
Step 3: write. lol. and think of elaboration/examples/link on the way
Step 4: Criteria + Stand

guess that would be the thought process during the exams.

Anyway, let's try to remember some factors:

SR-was there one?
YES - Marxist, Non-marxist, Hall-of-fame
NO - Evolutionary approach, not popular (so cannot be revolution), limited impact (application)

SR - what made it?
Renaissance -> Humanism -> Reformation -> Scientific Revolution (which includes 1.
development of scientific method and intellectual developments is phy, chem, bio, combined)

other not so important - age of discovery (voyages)

Some great examples for SR -
Copernicus - heliocentric theory
Galileo - heliocentric theory (but not infallible genius cuz he also denied Kepler's claim that planets orbit in an oval shape), telescope (aided in research)
Newton - the laws of motion
Darwin (BIO) - Theory of Evolution

ok. i blog until halfway dont feel like blogging liao. haha bye.