Driving Forces for the development of medicine
1. Religion
2. Technological advancements, education, profits?
3. Industrial revolution which led to specification of jobs
4. Necessity (e.g. plagues, wars) -> cause scientists to need to come up with new observations and experiments to come up with a correct treatment
5. Government
A-bomb
Pro:
1. To save lives (more fire bombing or an invasion would cause more deaths) - japanese resistance
2. USSR played no pat in the occupation of jap
3. Prevented future use of nuclear weapons when stockpiles were much larger
4. Counter CON1: too risky to waste a bomb
Con:
1. Prevention (could use demonstration, or at least 2nd one was useless)
2. It was used more to justify the money spent
3. Counter Pro 1: Jap were about to surrender and conditional surrender, which was what was achieved, could have been achieved much earlier even without the use of a-bomb
4. Counter Pro 2: sacrifice so many lives just for power politics?
How to answer qns...
Stand + Definition of terms
Group sources, support vs. against the hypothesis
Support (inference)... From source A, we can see...
Against (inference)
Reliability of sources
Which side do u trust more + why + factor used
yay. lol.
ok. so tml.
recess: borrow notes from LjS to mug for chem oba.
ya. ok. random post. dont read this post. lol.
Patrick
Monday, August 27, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment